my lucky friend, kim, has no idea what a skin tag is. so, this post is for her...and for any others out there who have better genes than i do. jerks.
***after reading jayne's comment, i realized that i failed to mention that this photo is NOT of me. i don't have a photo of myself...no camera...sniff, sniff. my skin tag was very similar to this one, but lower on my eyelid. actually, truth be told, i had three on my eyelid. i'm beginning to think my professor was right...i am a hideous beast. so what, i like hideous beasts, so there. oh shoot, where are the tissues?
7 comments:
I'm glad you got that baby removed. It must have been really irritating to you. I have skin tags all over, but usually under where my clothing rubs. Interesting, I've never known someone with one on their eyelids. You are one of a kind Danelle....one of a kind. In a good way. And you can still be part of our family even if your skin tags come back.
I only knew what a skin tag was recently.
I am right there with ya. I have several of those beauties as well as moles. Everytime I went to an OB appt I had Dr. Redd zap a few more.
Hey there sounds like you are keeping yourself healthy and that is good! If you see some cousin kids with the palmers and hursts those are mine. If you see them tell them your the one with the apron post on your blog. They will know who you are. They are in B-town for a few days. You make us laugh.
um...well that's nice...the photo. you could have chosen a lovely arm pit skin tag.....
You are NOT a hideous beast. That professor is a hideous beast for making you think of yourself that way. And I would have totally pretended that was a picture of yourself---embellish. That's what us Thomas' do.
thanks for the photo! Now I'm wondering if some of my lovely things i thought were moles are actually skin tags? By the way, I think you should take "hideous beast" and go with it, as I have gone with "freakshow". It's liberating.
Post a Comment